Quote:
Originally Posted by coire  A game shouldn't be considered 'valuble' or put on a pedestal just because its terrible, that is crazy. There are plenty of Great N64 games, why should one terrible game be sought after? Games are made to be played, and there aren't many people who enjoy playing terrible games. Some people may enjoy playing Superman 64 and thats a justified reason for wanting on the VC, but wanting it to be on the VC because of its notority as a terrible game is crazy. There are plenty of great classic games out there that deserve a spot on the VC before Superman. |
You are kind of contradicting yourself; first you say that there aren't "bad games" as long as someone enjoy them. I agree, what I consider fun it could be considered boring for many of my friends.
But then you say that there are other games that should be on the VC before Superman64. If I consider what you said first, then Superman64 is not a "bad game" and should be, along with Mario or Donkey Kong 64, considered to be on the VC because for me, they have (it's just an example), the same value.
Although I understand what you are talking about. Maybe I'm the only person here that finished Superman64 without cheats. I really played through the whole game, and as I wrote before, this game IS part of our generation because it reflects (apart from the crazy quotes) what 3D games had turned into: a terrible waste of time, with lazy programmers releasing sloppy games that shadowed the N64's full potential.